
Home · Solutions · Electronics & Semiconductors
Solutions · Electronics & Semiconductors
Chips and electronics with customer‑ready safety evidence
ISO 26262-11 and EU Cyber Resilience Act evidence from one connected IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management toolchain, set up by consultants who work with electronics and semiconductor engineering teams.
The electronics and semiconductor sector
Safety and security now start in the chip
The sector covers semiconductor companies, fabless chip designers, IP vendors and electronics manufacturers that build boards, modules and control units. Their customers are carmakers and their suppliers, aircraft programs, industrial automation and consumer products, each with its own standards and audits.
More of a product's safety and security now depends on the chip, its firmware and its configuration. Customers expect requirements, safety analyses and verification evidence delivered with the part, and kept current through every revision.
ShiftSafety elements out of context
Chips are developed for markets, not single projects, with assumed safety requirements that each customer later checks against its own system.
ShiftFirmware as part of the product
Boot code, drivers and security firmware ship with the hardware and are updated in the field, so hardware and software share one life cycle.
ShiftCyber Resilience Act
From 11 December 2027 products with digital elements sold in the EU need secure development, vulnerability handling and security updates.
ShiftChiplets and complex SoCs
Multi-die packages, IP from several vendors and configurable SoCs multiply the variants and interfaces that need requirements.
Engineering challenges
What this means for software and systems engineering
Evidence for every customer
Automotive, avionics and industrial customers ask for different safety evidence on the same part: ISO 26262, DO-254 or IEC 61508.
Hardware and firmware together
Silicon, register map and firmware requirements stay consistent only when they are linked, not copied between documents.
Product families and derivatives
One design becomes many derivatives with different packages, memory sizes and features, each needing its own baseline.
Exchange with customers and IP vendors
Customer specifications come in, assumptions of use and safety manuals go out, and third-party IP adds its own documentation.
Security by design
The EU Cyber Resilience Act and IEC 62443-4-1 ask for security requirements, threat analysis and vulnerability handling for the life of the product.
Protecting design data
Specifications and IP are valuable, so customers and partners see only the parts they are allowed to see.
What customers audit
Where electronics teams lose time before a customer audit


The chip is developed as a safety element out of context. Assumptions about the customer's system are written once in a document and not linked to the requirements they shape.


The register map lives in a spreadsheet or a generator script. Firmware requirements and drivers are updated from an old copy.


Each derivative, package or customer variant gets a copied requirements set. Fixes reach some copies but not all.
Compliance map
ISO 26262-11, IEC 61508 and the EU Cyber Resilience Act, mapped to the toolchain
Pick a standard to see what it asks for, and where it lives in your toolchain once we have set it up.

Compliance is achieved by your organization and confirmed by your assessor or customer. Tools hold the evidence; we set them up so the evidence is complete and easy to show.
Capabilities
What your team can do on day one
Baselines for every derivative
Freeze a configuration for each tape-out, revision or derivative and compare it with the next one, item by item. Customers see exactly what changed and why.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Global Configuration Management
Hardware and firmware in one chain
Silicon, register map and firmware requirements are linked, so one change shows every requirement and test to recheck.
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Safety manuals from live data
Assumptions of use, safety mechanisms and verification summaries are generated from the tools, in your own templates.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Optimization – Publishing
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Customer exchange without retyping
Customer specifications come in and compliance statements go out through Requirements Interchange Format (ReqIF), compared with the previous delivery.
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
Verification coverage per revision
Simulation, silicon validation and firmware test results link to each requirement, with a coverage view per baseline.
IBM Engineering Test Management
Security and vulnerability handling
Threats, security requirements and vulnerability reports are linked to the releases they affect, ready for the Cyber Resilience Act.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management
IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
See every product we implement and support
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management, HCL and GitLab: licences, set-up, training and support from one team.
All products →
Validation labWe start from your hardware and firmware life cycle, not from the tool
We map ISO 26262, IEC 61508 and Cyber Resilience Act work products to artifact types, link rules and views in IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management, connect the tools your hardware and firmware teams already use, and train them on their own projects.
Learn more
Training, articles and services

Introduction to IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next
2 days · remote or on siteWhat’s new in IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management 7.1
Article · 28 min
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management deployment
Installation, configuration, migrationFAQ
Questions electronics and semiconductor teams ask us
Do we need to qualify IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next and IBM Engineering Test Management under ISO 26262-8?
Only where you rely on their output without checking it. ISO 26262-8 sets a tool confidence level from the tool's impact and the chance of detecting a tool error. Requirements and test management usually reach the lowest level, because reviews and verification catch errors. Coverage reports or generated safety manuals that you take credit for without review can raise it. We classify each use case with you and record the result in the safety plan.
Each automotive customer sends specifications in its own format. How do we answer them?
Customer specifications come in through ReqIF or document import, into a module per customer, with their IDs kept. Your compliance statement and comments are attributes on each requirement and go back in the same format, compared with the previous round. Customer requirements link to your own product requirements, so you see which customers a change affects before you agree to it, and answers stay consistent across customers.
How do we manage derivatives and revisions without copying requirement sets?
With streams and baselines in IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Global Configuration Management. The platform or base die is one stream. Each derivative reuses it and holds only its own differences, and every tape-out or metal fix gets a baseline. You compare derivatives item by item, bring fixes across where they apply, and deliver evidence to a customer for exactly the configuration it buys.
Our requirements are in IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS (9.x), with years of DXL scripts. How do we move?
Product family by product family. Parts in production often stay on IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS (9.x) until their next revision, while new developments start in IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next. When a family moves, modules, attributes and links move with their original IDs, and released baselines are kept, so evidence sent to customers stays reproducible. DXL scripts are inventoried first. Most become configuration, views or link rules.
Firmware teams work in Atlassian Jira and GitLab, hardware teams in their own flow. How does it connect?
Requirements stay in IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next. Firmware work items and merge requests in Atlassian Jira or GitLab link to them through OSLC connectors or a synchronization we configure. Results from simulation and lab tools are imported into IBM Engineering Test Management as test results linked to requirements. Each team keeps its tools, and the coverage view shows hardware and firmware verification side by side.
What does the EU Cyber Resilience Act change for our requirements and test process?
It turns security into a documented product requirement. When the main obligations apply on 11 December 2027, you need a risk assessment, security requirements that answer the essential requirements, evidence that they were tested, and vulnerability handling for the support period. We set these up as linked artifact types next to your safety requirements, aligned with IEC 62443-4-1 practices, so the technical documentation comes from the same data as your safety evidence.
Ready-made widgets for IBM DOORS Next
Add them to the ELM Mini Dashboard and hand repetitive requirements work over to them. Each one previews its changes first.
Browse all widgets


Content qualityClean text and glossary linksStyle Cleaner, Link Checker and more


Links and traceabilityFix, move and inspect linksLink Remover, Module To Base Links and more


Module structureBuild and repair module hierarchyModule Fill, Module Explorer 2.0 and more


Configuration and governanceBaselines, data models and auditsBaseline Archiver, Compare Data Models and more

Reporting and publishingCharts, maps and publishingPublishing URLs, Module Insights and more- See all widgetsScreenshots and details for every widget
Watch and learn
Our Videos
Demos, tutorials and customer stories on requirements, traceability and test.
Talk to our consultants
Leave your details and we will get back to you, usually within one business day.



